Platformizing Organizations: A Synthesis of the Literature (2024)

  • Altman, E. J., & Tripsas, M. (2015). Product to platform transitions: Implications of organizational identity. In C. Shalley, M. Hitt, & J. Zhou (Eds.), Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: Multilevel linkages (pp. 379–394) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Anderson, E. G., Jr., Parker, G. G., & Tan, B. (2014). Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 152–172.

  • Angrist, J. D., Caldwell, S., & Hall, J. V. (2017). Uber vs. taxi: A drivers eye view (No. w23891). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Armstrong, M., & Wright, J. (2007). Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Economic Theory, 32(2), 353–380.

  • Baldwin, C. Y., & Woodard, C. J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: A unified view. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 19–44). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.

  • Bakos, Y., & Katsamakas, E. (2008). Design and ownership of two-sided networks: Implications for Internet platforms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(2), 171–202.

  • Benlian, A., Hilkert, D., & Hess, T. (2015). How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementers’ perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 209–228.

  • Benlian, A., Kettinger, W. J., Sunyaev, A., Winkler, T. J., & Guest Editors. (2018). The transformative value of cloud computing: A decoupling, platformization, and recombination theoretical framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(3), 719–739.

  • Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872.

  • Boudreau, K. J. (2012). Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1409–1427.

  • Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2009). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 163–191). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Boudreau, K. J., Lacetera, N., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011). Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 57(5), 843–863.

  • Bresnahan, T. F., & Greenstein, S. (1999). Technological competition and the structure of the computer industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 47(1), 1–40.

  • Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 263–290.

  • Cennamo, C. (2019). Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives.

  • Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1331–1350.

  • Cennamo, C., Ozalp, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2018). Platform architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 461–478.

  • Chen, J., Fang, M., & Li, M. (2016). Advertising versus brokerage model for online trading platforms. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 575–596.

  • Ciborra, C. U. (1996). The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organization Science, 7(2), 103–118.

  • Clements, M. T. (2004). Direct and indirect network effects: Are they equivalent? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(5), 633–645.

  • Cramer, J., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. American Economic Review, 106(5), 177–182.

  • Dal Bianco, V., Myllärniemi, V., Komssi, M., & Raatikainen, M. (2014). The role of platform boundary resources in software ecosystems: A case study. In 11th working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA 2014, 7 April 2014–11 April 2014 (pp. 11–20). Sydney, NSW; Australia.

  • Dawande, M., Johar, M., Kumar, S., & Mookerjee, V. S. (2008). A comparison of pair versus solo programming under different objectives: An analytical approach. Information Systems Research, 19(1), 71–92.

  • de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135.

  • Domowitz, I., Hubbard, R. G., & Petersen, B. C. (1986). Business cycles and the relationship between concentration and price-cost margins. The RAND Journal of Economics, 17, 1–17.

  • Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sorensen, C., & Yoo, Y. (2015). Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 217–243.

  • Economides, N., & Katsamakas, E. (2006). Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Science, 52(7), 1057–1071.

  • Ellison, N. B. (2008). Introduction: Reshaping campus communication and community through social network sites. In G. Salaway, J. Borreson, & M. R. Nelson (Vol. Ed.), The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, Vol 8 (pp. 19–32). Educause Center for Applied Research. Boulder, CO: Educause.

  • Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2006). Strategies for two sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92–101.

  • Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Opening platforms: How, when and why? In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 131–162). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 1270–1285.

  • Evans, D. (2009). How catalysts ignite: The economics of platform-based start-ups. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 99–130). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Faraj, S., & Shimizu, T. (2018). Online communities and knowledge collaborations. In R. Aldag (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management (pp. 1–18). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1986). In J. Miller (Ed.), Economic issues in standardization in Telecommunications and equity: Policy research issues (pp. 165–178). North-Holland.

  • Fitzgerald, B. (2006). The transformation of open source software. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 587–598.

  • Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Mithas, S., & Heinzl, A. (2018). Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google photos. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 444–460.

  • Foros, Ø., Kind, H. J., & Shaffer, G. (2017). Apple’s agency model and the role of most-favored-nation clauses. The RAND Journal of Economics, 48(3), 673–703.

  • Franke, N., & Lüthje, C. (2020). User innovation. In Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management (pp. 1–32). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Gawer, A. (2009). Platforms, markets and innovation: An introduction. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249.

  • Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.

  • Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2011). Micro-strategizing in platform ecosystems: A multiple case study. In 32nd International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011 (Vol. 5, pp. 4202-4220), 4 December 2011–7 December 2011. Shanghai, China.

  • Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173–192.

  • Goldbach, T., Benlian, A., & Buxmann, P. (2018). Differential effects of formal and self-control in mobile platform ecosystems: Multi-method findings on third-party developers’ continuance intentions and application quality. Information & Management, 55(3), 271–284.

  • Greenwood, B. N., & Agarwal, R. (2016). Matching platforms and HIV incidence: An empirical investigation of race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Management Science, 62(8), 2281–2303.

  • Greenwood, B. N., & Wattal, S. (2017). Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol-related motor vehicle fatalities. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 163–187.

  • Hagiu, A. (2007). Merchant or two-sided platform? Review of Network Economics, 6(2), 115–133.

  • Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2014). Marketplace or reseller? Management Science, 61(1), 184–203.

  • Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 2056305115603080.

  • Huang, P., Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., & Wu, D. J. (2013). Appropriability mechanisms and the platform partnership decision: Evidence from enterprise software. Management Science, 59(1), 102–121.

  • Huber, T. L., Kude, T., & Dibbern, J. (2017). Governance practices in platform ecosystems: Navigating tensions between cocreated value and governance costs. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 563–584.

  • Hurni, T., & Huber, T. (2014). The interplay of power and trust in platform ecosystems of the enterprise application software industry. In 22nd European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2014, 9 June 2014–11 June 2014. Tel Aviv, Israel.

  • Jones, N. (2003). Competing after radical technological change: The significance of product line management strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1265–1287.

  • Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017). Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and Android smartphone ecosystems. Organization Science, 28(3), 531–551.

  • Karhu, K., Gustafsson, R., & Lyytinen, K. (2018). Exploiting and defending open digital platforms with boundary resources: Android’s five platform forks. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 479–497.

  • Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.

  • Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93–115.

  • Khan, F. (2016). The Uberization of healthcare: The forthcoming legal storm over mobile health technology’s impact on the medical profession. Health Matrix, 26, 123–172.

  • Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. (1994). Options thinking and platform investments: Investing in opportunity. California Management Review, 2, 52–71.

  • Krishnan, V., & Gupta, S. (2001). Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development. Management Science, 47(1), 52–68.

  • Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546–558.

  • Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18(3), 159–176.

  • Li, Z., & Agarwal, A. (2016). Platform integration and demand spillovers in complementary markets: Evidence from Facebook’s integration of Instagram. Management Science, 63(10), 3438–3458.

  • Lianos, I., & Motchenkova, E. (2013). Market dominance and search quality in the search engine market. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 9(2), 419–455.

  • Liu, H. (2010). Dynamics of pricing in the video game console market: Skimming or penetration? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 428–443.

  • Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–176.

  • Mantena, R., & Saha, R. L. (2012). Co-opetition between differentiated platforms in two-sided markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(2), 109–140.

  • Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487–505.

  • Meyer, M. H., & Lehnerd, A. P. (1997). The power of product platforms. New York: The Free Press.

  • Muffatto, M. (1999). Introducing a platform strategy in product development. International Journal of Production Economics, 60–61, 145–153.

  • Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2011). Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: Evidence from the field. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 40–57.

  • Nambisan, S., Siegel, D., & Kenney, M. (2018). On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(3), 354–368.

  • Nieborg, D. B., & Helmond, A. (2019). The political economy of Facebook’s platformization in the mobile ecosystem: Facebook Messenger as a platform instance. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 196–218.

  • Oh, W., & Pinsonneault, A. (2007). On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: Conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 239–265.

  • Ondrus, J., Gannamaneni, A., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). The impact of openness on the market potential of multi-sided platforms: A case study of mobile payment platforms. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 260–275.

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.

  • Ozer, M., & Vogel, D. (2015). Contextualized relationship between knowledge sharing and performance in software development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(2), 134–161.

  • Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2000). Internetwork externalities and free information goods. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Minneapolis Minnesota USA, October 2000 (pp. 107–116). New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery.

  • Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2014). Platform strategy. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. In M. Augier & D. J. Teece (Eds.), ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016 (Working Paper No. 2439323). Boston University School of Management Research Paper.

  • Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2018). Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Science, 64(7), 3015–3032.

  • Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., & Jiang, X. (2017). Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 255–266.

  • Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198–227.

  • Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2010). The third hand: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 443–471.

  • Perrons, R. K. (2009). The open kimono: How Intel balances trust and power to maintain platform leadership. Research Policy, 38(8), 1300–1312.

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York, NY: Free Press.

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York, NY: Free Press.

  • Porter, M. E. (1996). Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. International Regional Science Review, 19(1-2), 85–90.

  • Porter, M. E. (2001). Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62–78.

  • Qiu, Y., Gopal, A., & Hann, I. H. (2017). Logic pluralism in mobile platform ecosystems: A study of indie app developers on the iOS app store. Information Systems Research, 28(2), 225–249.

  • Ray, G., Muhanna, W. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 625–652.

  • Robertson, D., & Ulrich, K. (1998). Planning for product platforms. Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 19–31.

  • Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.

  • Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Externalities and regulation in card payment systems. Review of Network Economics, 5(1), 1–14.

  • Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125–143.

  • Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 63–76.

  • Sawhney, M. S. (1998). Leveraged high-variety strategies: From portfolio thinking to platform thinking. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(1), 54–61.

  • Schilling, M. A. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 312–334.

  • Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Design and governance of platform ecosystems—Key concepts and issues for future research. In Proceedings of Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), 12 June 2016–15 June 2016, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). The march into socialism. The American Economic Review, 40(2), 446–456.

  • Setia, P., Bayus, B., & Rajagopalan, B. (2020). The takeoff of open source software: A signaling perspective based on community activities. MIS Quarterly, 44(3), 1439–1458.

  • Setia, P., & Patel, P. C. (2013). How information systems help create OM capabilities: Consequents and antecedents of operational absorptive capacity. Journal of Operations Management, 31(6), 409–431.

  • Setia, P., Rajagopalan, B., Sambamurthy, V., & Calantone, R. (2012). How peripheral developers contribute to open-source software development. Information Systems Research, 23(1), 144–163.

  • Setia, P., Venkatesh, V., & Joglekar, S. (2013). Leveraging digital technologies: How information quality leads to localized capabilities and customer service performance. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 565–590.

  • Sokol, D. D., & Comerford, R. (2016). Antitrust and regulating big data. George Mason Law Review, 23, 1129–1162.

  • Song, P., Xue, L., Rai, A., & Zhang, C. (2018). The ecosystem of software platform: A study of asymmetric cross-side network effects and platform governance. MIS Quarterly, 42(1), 121–142.

  • Sur, M., Lee, D. J., & Kim, K. T. (2019). Optimal revenue sharing in platform markets: A Stackelberg model. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 18(4), 1–15.

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

  • Thomas, L. D., Autio, E., & Gann, D. M. (2014). Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 198–219.

  • Tiwana, A. (2013). Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

  • Tiwana, A. (2015). Platform desertion by app developers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(4), 40–77.

  • Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687.

  • Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2006). Extending green practices across the supply chain: The impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 795–821.

  • Varian, H., & Shapiro, C. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142.

  • Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195–1215.

  • Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. New York: Free Press.

  • Wiesche, M., Schermann, M., & Krcmar, H. (2011). Understanding the role of information technology for organizational control design: Risk control as new control mechanism. In M. Nüttgens, A. Gadatsch, K. Kautz, I. Schirmer, & N. Blinn (Eds.), IFIP WG 8.6 International Working Conference on Governance and Sustainability in Information Systems—Managing the transfer and diffusion of IT (pp. 135–152). Hamburg, Germany: Springer.

  • Wu, C. (2015). Matching value and market design in online advertising networks: An empirical analysis. Marketing Science, 34(6), 906–921.

  • Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.

  • Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2017). The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(5), 687–705.

  • Zhang, J., Cao, Q., & He, X. (2019). Contract and product quality in platform selling. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(3), 928–944.

  • Zhu, F., & Iansiti, M. (2012). Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management Journal, 33(1), 88–106.

Platformizing Organizations: A Synthesis of the Literature (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Corie Satterfield

Last Updated:

Views: 5549

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (42 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Corie Satterfield

Birthday: 1992-08-19

Address: 850 Benjamin Bridge, Dickinsonchester, CO 68572-0542

Phone: +26813599986666

Job: Sales Manager

Hobby: Table tennis, Soapmaking, Flower arranging, amateur radio, Rock climbing, scrapbook, Horseback riding

Introduction: My name is Corie Satterfield, I am a fancy, perfect, spotless, quaint, fantastic, funny, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.